Complete response to front-line therapies is associated with long-term survival in HIV-related lymphomas in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for people living with HIV (PLWH) who develop lymphomas has been greatly improved by combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. However, real-world clinical data on this patient group in Asia are limited. METHODS: Treatment outcomes were retrospectively examined for 104 PLWH with lymphomas between 2000 and 2019. The cohort comprised five PLWH with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and 99 with non-Hodgkin lymphomas, including 61 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 19 with Burkitt lymphoma (BL), nine with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and ten with other subtypes. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were as follows: HL (100%), PCNSL (76.2%), other subtypes (60.0%), BL (57.4%), and DLBCL (55.6%). Individuals who achieved complete response (CR) to front-line therapies had a significantly better 5-year OS rate than those without (96.2% vs. 17.8%, p < 0.001). PLWH who received cART for ≤6 months had significantly lower CD4+ T-cell counts at lymphoma diagnosis than those who received cART for longer periods (p = 0.048). Additionally, the 5-year OS rate was better for PLWH who received cART for ≤6 months before lymphomas diagnosis than those who received cART for longer periods (64.5% vs. 51.9%, p = 0.114). CONCLUSIONS: PLWH with DLBCL or BL had OS rates compatible to patients without HIV infection. Better outcomes for patients achieving CR to front-line therapy and those with shorter cART duration before lymphoma diagnosis suggest an underlying biological distinction in the lymphomas and the involvement of immunity, which warrants further studies.

Effectiveness and evolution of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein titers after three doses of COVID-19 vaccination in people with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Real-world vaccine effectiveness following the third dose of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 remains less investigated among people with HIV (PWH). METHODS: PWH receiving the third dose of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 (either 50- or 100-µg) were enrolled. Participants were followed for 180 days until the fourth dose of COVID-19 vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 infection, seroconversion of anti-nucleocapsid IgG, death, or loss to follow-up. Anti-spike IgG was determined every 1-3 months. RESULTS: Of 1427 participants undergoing the third-dose COVID-19 vaccination, 632 (44.3%) received 100-µg mRNA-1273, 467 (32.8%) 50-µg mRNA-1273, and 328 (23.0%) BNT162b2 vaccine and the respective rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection or seroconversion of anti-nucleocapsid IgG was 246.1, 280.8 and 245.2 per 1000 person-months of follow-up (log-rank test, p = 0.28). Factors associated with achieving anti-S IgG titers >1047 BAU/mL included CD4 count <200 cells/mm3 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.11; 95% CI, 0.04-0.31), plasma HIV RNA >200 copies/mL (aOR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09-0.80), having achieved anti-spike IgG >141 BAU/mL within 3 months after primary vaccination (aOR, 3.69; 95% CI, 2.68-5.07), receiving BNT162b2 vaccine as the third dose (aOR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.10-0.41; reference, 100-µg mRNA-1273), and having previously received two doses of mRNA vaccine in primary vaccination (aOR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1,75-3.45; reference, no exposure to mRNA vaccine). CONCLUSIONS: PWH receiving different types of the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine showed similar vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection. An additional dose with 100-µg mRNA-1273 could generate a higher antibody response than with 50-µg mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 vaccine.

Achievements of COVID-19 vaccination programs: Taiwanese perspective.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is a global health crisis. The specific characteristics of aerosol transmission in the latent period and the contagiousness of SARS-CoV-2 lead to rapid spread of infection in the community. Vaccination is the most effective method for preventing infection and severe outcomes. As of December 1, 2022, 88% of the Taiwanese population had received at least two doses of COVID-19 vaccines. Heterologous vaccination with ChAdOx1-mRNA-based or ChAdOx1-protein-based vaccines has been found to elicit higher immunogenicity than homologous vaccination with ChAdOx1-ChAdOx1 vaccines. A longitudinal cohort study revealed that 8-12-week intervals between the two heterologous vaccine doses of the primary series led to good immunogenicity and that the vaccines were safe. A third booster dose of mRNA vaccine is being encouraged to evoke effective immune responses against variants of concern. A novel domestic recombinant protein subunit vaccine (MVC-COV1901) was manufactured and authorized for emergency use in Taiwan. It has shown a good safety profile, with promising neutralizing antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2. Given the global pandemic due to emerging novel variants of SARS-CoV-2, booster COVID-19 vaccines and appropriate intervals between booster doses need to be investigated.

Effectiveness of second-generation integrase strand-transfer inhibitor-based regimens for antiretroviral-experienced people with HIV who had viral rebound.

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral regimens containing a second-generation integrase strand-transfer inhibitor (INSTI) plus 2 nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are the recommended therapy for people with HIV (PWH) who are antiretroviral-naïve or on stable antiretroviral therapy (ART) with viral suppression. Real-world data on the virologic effectiveness of co-formulated bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) among PWH with virologic failure while receiving other ART remain sparse. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of PWH who had viral rebound with plasma HIV RNA >1000 copies/mL and were switched to either dolutegravir combined with 2 NRTIs or BIC/FTC/TAF. The primary end point was re-achieving viral suppression within the first 48 weeks of switch. The association between NRTI-related resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) and virologic effectiveness was examined. RESULTS: Seventy-nine PWH with viral rebound while receiving other antiretroviral regimens were included. Within the first 48 weeks of switch, the overall probability of re-achieving viral suppression was 79.7% (82.5% [33/40] and 76.9% [30/39] for BIC/FTC/TAF and dolutegravir-based regimens, respectively, p = 0.78). PWH with a higher CD4 lymphocyte count (adjusted odds ratio, per 100-cell/mm3 increase, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.95) were more likely to re-achieve viral suppression. Among PWH switching to BIC/FTC/TAF who had pre-existing RAMs to NRTIs before switch, 14 of 15 (93.3%) successfully achieved viral suppression. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to BIC/FTC/TAF and dolutegravir-based regimens could re-achieve viral suppression in four-fifth of the PWH who experienced viral rebound during treatment with other antiretroviral regimens. Pre-existing NRTI-related RAMs did not have adverse impact on the effectiveness of dolutegravir combined with 2 NRTIs or BIC/FTC/TAF.

Higher serologic responses of early syphilis to single-dose benzathine penicillin G plus doxycycline versus single-dose benzathine penicillin G alone among people with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Single-dose benzathine penicillin G (BPG) is the preferred therapy for early syphilis, but poorer serologic responses have been observed among people with HIV (PWH). No enhanced regimen has previously been shown to improve serologic outcomes of early syphilis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to compare the treatment responses to single-dose BPG combined with 7-day doxycycline versus BPG alone in PWH who presented with early syphilis. Rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titers were determined every 3-6 months for all included PWH. Serologic response was defined as at least a fourfold decline in RPR titers at month 12. RESULTS: During January 2018 to March 2022, 223 PWH with 307 episodes of early syphilis received single-dose BPG plus doxycycline and 347 PWH with 391 episodes received BPG alone. The median age was 36 years and baseline CD4 count was 600 cells/mm3. In the intention-to-treat with last-observation-carried-forward analysis, PWH receiving BPG plus doxycycline had a significantly higher serologic response rate at 12 months of treatment than those receiving BPG alone (79.5% vs 70.3%, respectively; P= .006). The factors associated with 12-month serologic response were RPR titer (per 1-log2 increase, adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.25; 95% CI, 1.15-1.35) and receipt of BPG plus doxycycline (AOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.20-2.46). In the subgroup analyses, BPG plus doxycycline was consistently associated with a better serologic response than BPG alone at month 12. CONCLUSIONS: Among PWH with early syphilis, single-dose BPG plus doxycycline achieved higher serologic responses than BPG alone during a 12-month follow-up period.

Durability of serologic responses to inactivated hepatitis A virus vaccination among people living with HIV following acute hepatitis A outbreak: a 5-year follow-up study.

Serologic responses to hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccination may wane among immunocompromised populations. To evaluate the long-term seroresponses to 2-dose HAV vaccination, we retrospectively included people living with HIV (PLWH) who had achieved seroconversion within 12 months after vaccination at a university hospital during an outbreak of acute hepatitis A between 2015 and 2017. PLWH included in the study received either Havrix or Vaqta. The seroresponses were evaluated 60 months after the second dose of vaccination and estimated by the intention-to-treat (ITT) with last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Overall, 986 PLWH (median age, 34 years and CD4 count, 587 cells/µL) were included. The rates of PLWH with persistent seroprotection at month 60 of vaccination were 90.7% (894/986) and 97.4% (748/768) in the ITT with LOCF and PP analyses, respectively. PLWH with persistent seroprotection had achieved higher peak anti-HAV IgG titers after vaccination and had a slower decline in antibody levels compared with those with seroreversion. In the multivariable analysis, seroreversion at month 60 was associated with a higher body-mass index (per 1-kg/m2 increase, AOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.17), lowest-ever CD4 count (per 10-cell/µL increase, AOR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00), plasma HIV RNA <200 copies/ml at vaccination (AOR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.14-0.59), and having received Vaqta as the first dose of HAV vaccination (AOR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27-0.70). The seroprotection against HAV remained high in the long-term follow-up among PLWH on antiretroviral therapy after 2-dose HAV vaccination. Regular monitoring of seroresponses and timely administration of HAV vaccines are warranted to maintain seroprotection.

Optimal Frequency of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA Testing for Detection of Acute HCV Infection Among At-risk People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: A Multicenter Study.

Using 3-stage pooled-plasma hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA testing performed quarterly among at-risk people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH), we found that if testing had been performed every 6 or 12 months, 58.6%-91.7% of PWH who recently acquired HCV would be delayed for diagnosis and might contribute to onward HCV transmission with longer durations.

Immunogenicity and safety of heterologous mRNA-1273/MVC-COV1901 vaccination versus homologous mRNA1273 vaccination: A randomized, double-blind controlled study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: MVC-COV1901 is a protein vaccine based on the same SARS-CoV-2 strain used in mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273. Data are lacking on immunogenicity and safety of MVC-COV1901 as heterologous boost for people already received one dose of mRNA-1273. METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind trial that recruited adults aged 20-70 years who previously received a single dose of mRNA-1273 vaccine and were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a second dose with the homologous vaccine or protein-based MVC-COV1901 8-12 weeks after the first dose. The primary outcome was neutralizing antibody titers in terms of the geometric mean titer (GMT) 14 days after the second dose. Safety was assessed in all participants who received a dose of the study vaccine. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05079633). RESULTS: From September 30 to November 5, 2021, 144 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to the MVC-COV1901 boost group (n = 72) or the mRNA-1273 boost group (n = 72). The neutralizing antibodies on Day 15 and the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers on Day 15 and 29 of homologous mRNA-1273 were significantly higher than those of heterologous mRNA-1273/MVC-COV1901. Cellular immune responses were comparable in both groups. However, adverse events were much more frequent after the mRNA-1273 boost than after the MVC-COV1901 boost. CONCLUSION: Our results show that heterologous boost with MVC-COV1901 yielded an inferior immunogenicity but significantly fewer adverse events, compared with homologous boost with mRNA-1273. In people experienced severe adverse events after prime dose of mRNA-1273, as well as in periods when the supply of mRNA-1273 is limited, MVC-COV1901 could serve as an acceptable alternative heterologous boost.

Safety and immunogenicity of homologous versus heterologous booster dose with AZD1222, mRNA-1273, or MVC-COV1901 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in adults: An observer-blinded, multi-center, phase 2 randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: To report the safety and immunogenicity profile of a protein subunit vaccine (MVC-COV1901) compared to AZD1222 and mRNA-1273 when given as a third (booster) dose to individuals who have completed different primary vaccine regimens. METHODS: Individuals were classified according to their primary vaccine regimens, including two-dose MVC-COV1901, AZD1222, or mRNA-1273. A third dose of either half-dose MVC-COV1901, full-dose MVC-COV1901, standard-dose AZD1222, half-dose mRNA-1273 was administered in a 1:1:1:1 treatment ratio to individuals with an interval range of 84-365 days after the second dose. Endpoints included safety, humoral immunogenicity, and cell-mediated immune response on trial days 15 and 29. Exploratory endpoint included testing against variants of concern (Omicron). RESULTS: Overall, 803 participants were randomized and boosted - 201 received half-dose MVC-COV1901, 196 received full-dose MVC-COV1901, 203 received AZD1222, and 203 received half-dose mRNA-1273. Reactogenicity was mild to moderate, and less in the MVC-COV1901 booster group. Heterologous boosting provided the best immunogenic response. Boosting with mRNA-1273 in MVC-COV1901 primed individuals induced the highest antibody titers, even against Omicron, and cell-mediated immune response. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, MVC-COV1901 as a booster showed the best safety profiles. MVC-COV1901 as a primary series, with either homologous or heterologous booster, elicited the highest immunogenic response. CLINICALTRIALS: gov registration NCT05197153.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of 1-Dose vs Accelerated 2-Dose Schedule for Hepatitis A Virus (HAV) Revaccination Among People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Who Were Nonresponders or Had Seroreversion After Primary HAV Vaccination.

BACKGROUND: For people with human immunodeficiency virus (PWH) who have no serological responses to their primary hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccination or have seroreversion after successful primary vaccination, the optimal revaccination strategy remains unclear. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized clinical trial, PWH who tested negative for anti-HAV antibodies after receiving a standard 2-dose series of primary HAV vaccination were enrolled and assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 1 dose (the 1-dose group) or 2 doses of HAV vaccine administered 4 weeks apart (the 2-dose group). Serological response rates and anti-HAV antibody titers were compared at weeks 24 and 48. RESULTS: Of the 153 participants (77 in the 1-dose group and 76 in the 2-dose group), the overall serological response rates at week 48 after revaccination were similar between the 2 groups (2- vs 1-dose, 80.2% vs 71.4%, P = .20). However, anti-HAV antibody titers were consistently higher in the 2-dose group than in the 1-dose group. In subgroup analysis, PWH who were nonresponders to primary HAV vaccination were significantly more likely to mount a serological response after 2-dose HAV revaccination (68.4% vs 44.1%, P = .038). No severe adverse events were reported throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Two-dose HAV revaccination administered 4 weeks apart yielded similar serological responses as 1-dose revaccination among PWH who were nonresponders or had seroreversion after primary HAV vaccination. The 2-dose revaccination schedule generated significantly higher anti-HAV antibody titers and was more likely to elicit serological responses at week 48 among PWH who were nonresponders to primary HAV vaccination. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03855176.

Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome in People Living with HIV Who Presented with Interstitial Pneumonitis: an Emerging Challenge in the Era of Rapid Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy.

Studies on immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) in people living with HIV (PLWH) and presenting with interstitial pneumonitis (IP) are limited in the era of rapid antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation, particularly with integrase strand-transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-containing regimens. Adult PLWH presenting with IP in whom ART was initiated within 30 days of IP diagnosis between 2015 and 2021 were retrospectively identified. The primary outcome was the occurrence of IRIS within 30 days after admission. Of 88 eligible PLWH with IP (median age, 36 years; CD4 count, 39 cells/mm3), Pneumocystis jirovecii and cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA were detected via polymerase-chain-reaction assay in 69.3% and 91.7% of respiratory specimens, respectively. 22 PLWH (25.0%) had manifestations that met French's IRIS criteria for paradoxical IRIS. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of the all-cause mortality (0.0% versus 6.1%, P = 0.24), the occurrence of respiratory failure (22.7% versus 19.7%, P = 0.76), and pneumothorax (9.1% versus 7.6%, P = 0.82) between PLWH with and those without paradoxical IRIS. In a multivariable analysis, the factors associated with IRIS were the decline of the 1 month plasma HIV RNA load (PVL) with ART (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] per 1 log decrease, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.52 to 7.81), a baseline CD4-to-CD8 ratio of <0.1 (aHR, 3.47; 95% CI, 1.16 to 10.44), and the rapid initiation of ART (aHR, 7.95; 95% CI, 1.04 to 60.90). In conclusion, we found a high rate of paradoxical IRIS among PLWH with IP in the era of rapid ART initiation with INSTI-containing ART and this was associated with immune depletion at baseline, a rapid decline of PVL, and an interval of <7 days between the diagnosis of IP and the initiation of ART. IMPORTANCE Our study of PLWH who presented with IP mainly due to Pneumocystis jirovecii demonstrates that a high rate of paradoxical IRIS and a rapid decline of PVL with the initiation of ART, a CD4-to-CD8 ratio of <0.1 at baseline, and a short interval (<7 days) between the diagnosis of IP and the initiation of ART were associated with paradoxical IP-IRIS in PLWH. Paradoxical IP-IRIS was not associated with mortality or respiratory failure with heightened awareness among the HIV-treating physicians, rigorous investigations to exclude the possibilities of concomitant infections, or the malignancies and adverse effects of medications, including the cautious use of corticosteroids.

Evolution of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein titers after two-dose of COVID-19 vaccination among people living with HIV.

Background: A community COVID-19 outbreak caused by the B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 variant occurred in Taiwan in May 2021. High-risk populations such as people living with HIV (PLWH) were recommended to receive two doses of COVID-19 vaccines. While SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have demonstrated promising results in general population, real-world information on the serological responses remains limited among PLWH. Methods: PLWH receiving the first dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine from 2020 to 2021 were enrolled. Determinations of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG titers were performed every one to three months, the third dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. All serum samples were tested for anti-nucleocapsid antibody and those tested positive were excluded from analysis. Results: A total of 1189 PLWH were enrolled: 829 (69.7%) receiving two doses of the AZD1222 vaccine, 232 (19.5%) of the mRNA-1273 vaccine, and 128 (10.8%) of the BNT162b2 vaccine. At all time-points, PLWH receiving two doses of mRNA vaccines had consistently higher antibody levels than those receiving the AZD1222 vaccine (p <0.001 for all time-point comparisons). Factors associated with failure to achieve an anti-spike IgG titer >141 BAU/mL within 12 weeks, included type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.24; 95% CI, 1.25-4), a CD4 T cell count <200 cells/mm3 upon receipt of the first dose of vaccination (aOR, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.31-9) and two homologous AZD1222 vaccinations (aOR, 16.85; 95%CI, 10.13-28). For those receiving two doses of mRNA vaccines, factors associated with failure to achieve an anti-spike IgG titer >899 BAU/mL within 12 weeks were a CD4 T cell count <200 cells/mm3 on first-dose vaccination (aOR, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.08-14.42) and dual BNT162b2 vaccination (aOR, 4.21; 95% CI, 2.57-6.89). Conclusions: Two doses of homologous mRNA vaccination achieved significantly higher serological responses than vaccination with AZD1222 among PLWH. Those with CD4 T cell counts <200 cells/mm3 and DM had consistently lower serological responses.

Immunogenicity and safety of high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in older adults in Taiwan: A phase III, randomized, multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: High-dose influenza vaccine offers better protection against influenza/associated complications compared with standard-dose formulation. We evaluated immunogenicity and safety of high-dose influenza vaccine (QIV-HD) and standard-dose (QIV-SD) in older adults (≥ 65 years) in Taiwan. METHODS: This was a phase III, randomized, modified double-blind, active-controlled, multi-center, descriptive study in older adults. Participants (N = 165) were randomized 1:1 to receive QIV-HD or QIV-SD vaccine (clinicaltrials.gov#NCT04537234). RESULTS: For all four influenza strains, geometric means titers (GMTs) of hemagglutination inhibition were higher for the QIV-HD than QIV-SD with adjusted GMT ratios (95 % CI) of 2.65 (1.87-3.75) for A/H1N1; 1.76 (1.31-2.38) for A/H3N2; 2.60 (1.90-3.56) for B/Victoria; and 2.01 (1.57-2.56) for B/Yamagata. The seroconversion was higher for QIV-HD than QIV-SD with similar safety profiles across both groups. CONCLUSION: QIV-HD was highly immunogenic for four influenza strains and have acceptable safety profile in older adults aged ≥ 65 years in Taiwan.

Safety and immunogenicity of MVC-COV1901 vaccine in older adults: Phase 2 randomized dose-comparison trial.

INTRODUCTION: Older adults are subject to higher COVID-19 infection and mortality rates. Safety and immunogenicity of MVC-COV1901, a protein subunit vaccine have been demonstrated in phase 2 clinical trial for the general population, and negative correlations have been observed between immune responses and age, however, older adults were under-represented. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, multi-center study compared safety and immunogenicity of high-dose (25 mcg) to mid-dose (15 mcg) of MVC-COV1901 administered 2 times 28 days apart in 420 participants of 65 years and older. The results have been stratified by the comorbidity status. RESULTS: Both high and mid-dose regimens elicited mostly mild adverse events and robust immune responses when measured as neutralizing and binding antibodies titers. High doses elicited better immune responses in the group without comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Given the general population-associated safety and immunogenicity of MVC-COV1901, we recommend high dose for immunization of elder adults with MVC-COV1901. The clinical trial was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (NCT04822025).

Hepatitis C Virus Reinfection in People With HIV in Taiwan After Achieving Sustained Virologic Response With Antiviral Treatment: The RECUR Study.

Background: Data on hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection in East Asian people with HIV after treatment-induced sustained virologic response (SVR) are limited. Methods: HIV/HCV-coinfected patients in Taiwan who achieved SVR12 with interferon (IFN) or direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) between 2005 and 2021 underwent HCV RNA measurements at SVR24 and then biannually. HCV reinfection was defined as the detection of different HCV strains beyond SVR12. HIV-negative, low-risk individuals with SVR12 served as reference patients. Crude reinfection rates and secular trends were assessed. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify baseline factors associated with HCV reinfection. Results: A total of 216 HIV-positive and 1589 reference patients were recruited, with median follow-up durations of 3.0 and 6.0 years, respectively. During a total of 772 person-years of follow-up (PYFU), the HCV reinfection rate in HIV-positive patients was 4.02 per 100 PYFU (95% CI, 2.85-5.65), while the HCV reinfection rate in reference patients was 0.14 per 100 PYFU (95% CI, 0.09-0.23) during 10 862 PYFU. HIV-positive patients had a higher risk of HCV reinfection than reference patients (hazard ratio [HR], 17.63; 95% CI, 7.10-43.80; P < .001). No baseline factors were predictive of HCV reinfection in HIV-positive patients. The incidence of HCV reinfection in HIV-positive patients increased after 2015, when DAAs were made available in Taiwan. Conclusions: The risk of HCV reinfection remains high in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with treatment-induced SVR12. In addition to mass screening and treatment scale-up, strategies to reduce reinfection are needed for HCV microelimination in HIV-positive patients in Taiwan.

Low-level viraemia and virologic failure among people living with HIV who received maintenance therapy with co-formulated bictegravir, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide versus dolutegravir-based regimens.

Real-world experience with low-level viraemia (LLV) and its impact remain less reported among people living with HIV (PLWH) who receive antiretroviral therapy (ART) containing second-generation integrase strand transferase inhibitors, including dolutegravir and bictegravir. This retrospective cohort study included virally suppressed PLWH who achieved plasma HIV-RNA viral load (PVL) <50 copies/mL for ≥6 months and were switched to either dolutegravir- or bictegravir-based ART. Incidence rates of developing LLV events (PVL, 50-200 copies/mL) and virologic failure (VF) (PVL ≥1000 copies/mL) were compared between the dolutegravir and bictegravir cohorts. A total of 623 and 862 PLWH switched to dolutegravir-based and bictegravir-based ART, respectively, were included. The incidence rate of developing LLV was 6.2 per 100 person-years of follow-up (PYFU) in the bictegravir cohort and 3.8 per 100 PYFU in the dolutegravir cohort [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.90-2.95; P = 0.08], while rates of VF were 0.69 per 100 PYFU and 0.95 per 100 PYFU, respectively, in the bictegravir and dolutegravir cohorts (IRR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.12-3.39; P = 0.34). Presence of LLV events was not associated with subsequent VF in multivariate analysis. Secondary analysis also demonstrated that resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) before switch were not associated with adverse virologic outcomes in either cohort. In conclusion, among virally suppressed PLWH, the incidences of developing LLV or VF were similar after switch to dolutegravir- or bictegravir-based ART. Pre-existing RAMs to NRTIs or LLV events were not associated with subsequent VF.

Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination among people living with HIV during a COVID-19 outbreak.

COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for at-risk populations, but the vaccine effectiveness in people living with HIV (PLWH) remains incompletely understood. Here we demonstrate that COVID-19 vaccination was clinically effective among PLWH during the outbreak setting with a low endemicity of COVID-19 where non-pharmaceutical interventions were strictly implemented.

Hepatitis C microelimination among people living with HIV in Taiwan.

To reach the WHO target of hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination by 2025, Taiwan started to implement free-of-charge direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment programme in 2017. Evaluating the progress of HCV microelimination among people living with HIV (PLWH) is a critical step to identify the barriers to HCV elimination. PLWH seeking care at a major hospital designated for HIV care in Taiwan between January 2011 and December 2021 were retrospectively included. For PLWH with HCV-seropositive or HCV seroconversion during the study period, serial HCV RNA testing was performed using archived samples to confirm the presence of HCV viremia and estimate the prevalence and incidence of HCV viremia. Overall, 4199 PLWH contributed to a total of 27,258.75 person-years of follow-up (PYFU). With the reimbursement of DAAs and improvement of access to treatments, the prevalence of HCV viremia has declined from its peak of 6.21% (95% CI, 5.39-7.12%) in 2018 to 2.09% (95% CI, 1.60-2.77%) in 2021 (decline by 66.4% [95% CI, 55.4-74.7%]); the incidence has declined from 25.94 per 1000 PYFU (95% CI, 20.44-32.47) in 2019 to 12.15% per 1000 PYFU (95% CI, 8.14-17.44) (decline by 53.2% [95% CI, 27.3-70.6%]). However, the proportion of HCV reinfections continued to increase and accounted for 82.8% of incident HCV infections in 2021. We observed significant declines of HCV viremia among PLWH with the expansion of the DAA treatment programme in Taiwan. Further improvement of the access to DAA retreatments is warranted to achieve the goal of HCV microelimination.

Durability and Immunogenicity of Neutralizing Antibodies Response Against Omicron Variants After Three Doses of Subunit SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine MVC-COV1901: An Extension to an Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1 Study.

INTRODUCTION: MVC-COV1901 is a protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine based on the stable prefusion spike protein S-2P adjuvanted with CpG 1018 and aluminum hydroxide. Interim results of a phase 2 clinical trial demonstrated favorable safety profile and immunogenicity and the vaccine has been authorized for use in Taiwan. However, waning antibody levels after immunization and variants of concern (VoC) could negatively impact vaccine-induced neutralization of virus. In this extension to the phase 1 clinical study we investigated a three-dose regimen of MVC-COV1901 for durability of antibody levels and virus neutralization capacity, including neutralization of the Omicron variant. METHODS: Forty-five healthy adults from 20 to 49 years of age were divided into three groups of 15 participants receiving two doses of either low dose (LD), medium dose (MD), or high dose (HD) of MVC-COV1901. Six months after the second dose (day 209), a third MD dose of MVC-COV1901 was administered to the LD and MD groups and a HD dose was given to the HD group. Safety was followed for up to 28 days after the booster dose by monitoring incidences of adverse events (AE). Immunogenicity and antibody persistence for up to 6 months after the booster dose were assessed by neutralizing assay with the wild-type (Wuhan) SARS-CoV-2 virus. To examine the immunogenicity of booster dose against variants, neutralizing assays were carried out with the Alpha, Beta, and Delta variant viruses and the Omicron variant pseudovirus using samples from 4 weeks after the booster dose. RESULTS: Adverse reactions after the booster dose were mostly mild and comparable to that of the first two doses. Compared to day 209, neutralizing antibodies were increased by 10.3-28.9 times at 4 weeks after the booster. During the 6-month follow-up after the booster, the rate of decline of neutralizing antibody level was much less than that after the second dose. Three doses of MVC-COV1901 also improved antibody-mediated neutralization of Alpha, Beta, and Delta variants as well as the Omicron variant pseudovirus. CONCLUSION: Our data showed increased persistence of neutralizing antibodies and enhancement of immunogenicity against VoCs offered after a third dose of MVC-COV1901. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04487210.

Sexually-transmitted hepatitis C virus reinfections among people living with HIV in Taiwan: the emerging role of genotype 6.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfections after successful treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) pose a significant challenge to HCV elimination, especially among high-risk people living with HIV (PLWH). In this study, PLWH who had achieved HCV viral clearance with DAAs were included between January 2018 and June 2021. PLWH having acquired HCV infections after 2017 were classified as "recent-infection group," and those before 2017 as "remote-infection group," and the incidences of HCV reinfection were compared between two groups. Clinical and behavioural characteristics were evaluated to identify associated factors with HCV reinfection. A total of 284 PLWH were included: 179 in the recent-infection group and 105 in the remote-infection group. After a median follow-up of 2.32 years (interquartile range [IQR], 0.13-3.94), the overall incidence of HCV reinfection was 5.8 per 100 person-years of follow-up (PYFU). The incidence in the recent-infection group was significantly higher than that in the remote-infection group (9.8 vs. 0.4 per 100 PYFU, p < 0.001). The leading HCV genotypes before DAA treatment were genotypes 2 (31.0%), 1b (26.8%), and 6 (21.8%); however, genotype 6 (58.8%) became predominant upon reinfection. Younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per 1-year increase, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-0.99), condomless receptive anal sex (aOR, 14.5; 95% CI, 2.37-88.8), rimming (aOR, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.14-13.1), and recent syphilis (aOR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.26-5.91) were linked to HCV reinfections. In conclusion, PLWH acquiring HCV after 2017 had a significantly higher risk for sexually-transmitted HCV reinfections. The predominance of HCV genotype 6 reinfections suggests possible on-going clustered HCV infections among at-risk PLWH.